Breastfeeding in bathrooms a thing of the past?

A little-discussed nugget of law tucked into the federal health care reform act directs businesses that have more than 50 employees to give lactating mothers a private space in which to pump milk or breastfeed, as well as a “reasonable” amount of (unpaid) time to do so.

This Free Press article forwarded to me this morning discusses it in more detail, and got me reminiscing about all the gross places in which I struggled to pump milk for the short six weeks I breast-fed my newborn baby girl.

Bathrooms, mostly. I was struggling to wrap up my journalism degree at the time, and if the University of Montana had a dedicated lactation room, I was not aware of it. I was also working at the Kaimin, and have fond memories of sitting with my back against the door (because it didn’t lock) of the old editor’s office – a room so filthy I had to scrape what looked like crusty old macaroni and cheese off the windows just to get a little natural light – praying no one would barge in.

The article also got me looking around the Missoulian, pondering places I might pump if I were lactating now. Hmm. Looks like the bathroom again.

Which brings me to my favorite quote from the article. Here’s what Michigan Breastfeeding Network cochair and Children’s Hospital of Michigan pediatrican Rosemary Shy had to say about breastfeeding in bathrooms: “I want every employer who says (pump in a bathroom) to be forced to eat his lunch in the bathroom for a month.”

The law creates a lot of questions – how will this work for non-office staff? – and will no doubt lead to many more as the details are hashed out. But I think it’s a positive thing that the nation is acknowledging its lactating labor force at all, and I, for one, welcome the long overdue discussion.

- MM

1 Comment »

Advertisement

Missoula kids organize first Diversity Day

A press release from the National Coalition Building Institute in Missoula today announces that next Monday, April 12, will be Missoula’s first annual Diversity Day, and links the planned celebration to an opportunity to support the proposed inclusion of “gender identity or expression” to the city’s anti-discrimination ordinance.

See, Missoula’s City Council is scheduled to consider the ordinance during its regular Monday night meeting that same day.

The release explains that the day is being established through the work of Respect Club members – students at Missoula middle schools C.S. Porter, Meadow Hill and Washington. Respect Club is an after-school program run in partnership with Flagship and NCBI that aims to give students a forum to talk about violence, prejudice other issues in their schools, with the goal of raising awareness of problems and promoting solutions.

Many Missoulians are already familiar with Respect Clubs through their annual community projects. Last year, for instance, students at C.S. Porter, MeadowHill and Washington middle schools made a documentary film giving the wider community an inside look at how issues like bullying and homophobia impact our kids.  

To participate in Diversity Day, show up at Caras Park on April 12 at 6 p.m. There, Mayor John Engen is expected to make an appearance in order to issue an official proclamation declaring the day Diversity Day. He’ll be there in addition to other “youth and community speakers representing all of Missoula’s diverse community members.” 

According to the release, the “rally will be followed by a parade from Caras Park down to the Missoula City Council Chambers on Pine St., where interested participants can lend their support to the passing of a non-discrimination ordinance for Missoula.”

The release also included this quote from a seventh-grader at Meadow Hill: ”I want a diversity day because being different is important.  Diversity Day could help bring our community together, and we all need to be recognized.” 

- MM

3 Comments »

Juneau says Montana economy will benefit from Farm to School

Earlier this month, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack was in Montana. This week, Montana Superintendent of Public Instruction Denise Juneau is in Washington D.C. to speak to the Senate agriculture committee, which includes Montana Sen. Max Baucus, and which is expected to take up the Child Nutrition Act on Wednesday.

According to the release, Juneau plans on lending her support to Farm to School programs.

“Farm to School programs educate students about the interconnection of food, nutrition, and agriculture, and encourage them to eat more fruits and vegetables and make healthier food choices.”

“ ‘Agriculture is the state’s largest industry,’ said Juneau. ‘Schools can also provide a substantial and consistent market for local farmers and ranchers, which support our rural communities. My goal is to help empower our delegation to go in and talk about this issue.’ ”

Read on for the full release:

Read the rest of this entry »

2 Comments »

Sarah Palin, Teen Challenge and Missoula

I’ve written before about the fundraising efforts of Teen Challenge in Missoula, where young women get some faith-based help turning their lives around. The nonprofit runs a thrift store and a coffee shop, and the teens are regulars in the local craft fair circuit.

All pretty non-controversial. The group’s upcoming fundraising event, on the other hand, is raising some eyebrows, judging by the comments posted with the Missoulian story breaking the news that the most famous mom in Alaskan history will be coming to the Garden City in September. That’s right, Sarah Palin will speak in Missoula to help raise money for Teen Challenge. Her topic: “Take a Stand – For God, Family and Country.”

Love her? Hate her? Numbed by a staggering load of indifference? However you feel, Missoula Mom wants to know: Are you going, and why or why not?

- MM

9 Comments »

Think twice before taking your daughter to the U.S. Capitol

Lynette Long, a licensed psychologist in Chevy Chase, Maryland, penned an opinion piece noting the stark lack of female figures honored at the Capitol Building in Washington, D.C. – and it’s not for lack of material.

Read on:

Read the rest of this entry »

1 Comment »

Is glass or plastic better for baby bottles?

Back when I was bottle-feeding my baby (and it was only a few years ago), plastic bottles were the norm and it never occurred to me to question how much BPAs or other chemicals my daughter was ingesting with her formula.

Today, I received an opinion piece from Angela Logomasini, director of risk and environmental policy at the Competitive Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C. In it, Logomasini argues forcefully that plastic bottles have not been proven harmful and that plastic bans are a bad way to go. Here’s her full commentary:

Read the rest of this entry »

No Comments »

On childhood obesity: A response to Michelle Obama

The big news in Mom World today is First Mom Michelle Obama’s official launch of a nationwide anti-obesity initiative.

Consequently, my inbox has been flooded with commentary on the new initiative. I picked this one to share with you, dear readers, because it is written by Johann Christoph Arnold, the author of several books on parenting and children’s education.

It’s by no means the last word on the subject. In fact, I’d love to hear your thoughts on obesity in general and this initiative in particular.

- MM

Read the rest of this entry »

1 Comment »

Just who is pregnant here?

I received the following essay from a licensed psychologist in Chevy Chase, MD, last week. In it, Lynette Long really goes off on the phrase “We’re pregnant,” apparantly after hearing it one too many times. Read her thoughts – but be forewarned, she describes some of the anatomical apects of pregnancy and the differences between the sexes with an unflinching eye – and then tell me what you think:

“When did it become politically correct to say, we’re pregnant. Gag me with a spoon. We don’t get pregnant. I’ve yet to notice any person with a penis spending his mornings puking his guts out, having a speculum inserted inside his non-existent vagina, or changing his lifestyle to assure the birth of a healthy baby. I also haven’t noticed maternity stores for men where they sell elastic fronted boxer shorts or custom designed wife beater t-shirts for the newest part of the male anatomy: breasts. Nor have I noticed men giving up six packs for a forty-pound egg-shaped belly. So let’s get this straight, we’re not pregnant. Until cloning is a reality, it would be more accurate to say, we’re going to have a baby, since men still contribute 23 of the 46 chromosomes needed to produce a child. Speaking of production, I don’t see men volunteering to endure the excruciating pain of childbirth, the weeks of exhaustion after delivery, or the struggle to get that pre-baby figure back. Let’s not forget about those stretch-marks, that might never disappear or that ’small’ cut a doctor makes to minimize tearing during delivery, which ensures it will burn like ‘heck’ every time you urinate. Anthropologist Margaret Mead once said, ‘If men and women shared pregnancy and childbirth, no family would have over three children, since no man would do it twice.’ She was right.

“When I ask women why they say we’re pregnant rather than I’m pregnant, the responses are based on emotion not logic. ‘It’s sweet.’ ‘I want to include him. I want him to feel a part of it.’ ‘I’m scared and I don’t want to feel like I doing this alone.’ ‘I want him to feel responsible for the baby.’ ‘I want to create buy-in for my partner.’ Whatever happened to individuation and separation? ‘We’re pregnant’ is a denial of reality to create an artificial oneness. Expanding this ‘we-ness’ to other circumstances highlights the absurdity of the claim. The phrase, ‘we got a tooth pulled’ is not used to gain sympathy for a dental visit, nor is ‘we got a promotion’ used to brag about one’s accomplishments at work. Saying ‘we’re pregnant,’ doesn’t change a woman’s personal reality. No matter how you say it, in the end, pregnancy is something women have to do alone.

“The reason the phrase ‘we’re pregnant’ grates on my nerves is that it does what women too often do, share credit and diminish their own personal accomplishments. Pregnancy is a biologically expensive proposition for women. Adult men literally produce 100 million sperm a day and are physically capable of producing hundreds if not thousands of children in a lifetime. Women have a limited number of eggs and make significant biological sacrifices to have children. The phrase, we’re pregnant, diminishes a woman’s experience by implying men and women share equally in the experience. Women deserve full credit for enduring both the burden and responsibility of pregnancy.

“Besides the psychological implications of joint ownership of a pregnancy, there are significant legal implications. When men are pregnant also, who decides when whether or not to terminate a pregnancy? In Japan, where abortion is widely accepted and readily available, women have to get their husband’s permission to have an abortion. Similar legislation could be not far away in the United States and subtle differences in the way we describe experiences may impact the way we legislate them. Ohio Rep. John Adams introduced a bill this year that would require a woman to get the permission of the man she had sex with in order to have an abortion. He argued, men deserve the right to choose, too. So next time you want to say, we’re pregnant, think again. Women have fought long and hard for the right to choose, don’t jeopardize that right for emotional reasons. Protect everyone woman’s right to choose and embrace your pregnancy and the significant contribution you are making to your family.”

- MM

No Comments »

A case of parental rights

The big news in Montana today is, of course, the state Supreme Court’s ruling that a woman who helped care for her former partner’s adopted children shares parental rights.

To recap the case: One-half of a lesbian couple adopted two children (because in Montana, it’s illegal for two people of the same sex to marry) and they all shared a household for about 10 years. During that time, they both assumed parental responsibilities.

Then, the couple separated, and that’s when things got complicated. One of the women married (a man) and the other sued for “parental rights to the children and for an interest in the property they shared.”

The case eventually wound its way to the Supreme Court, where one side successfully argued that adults who establish a parent-child relationship have a compelling parental interest in those children.

The legal director for the Montana ACLU calls it “a victory for families in all shapes, sizes and colors.”

On the other side, the only dissenting Supreme Court justice said the ruling meant that “Consequences of geometric proportion will fall in the future upon many fit parents” because “Now, even parents who are fit and capable … are potentially subject to the claims of third parties for rights to their children.”

What say you?

- MM

No Comments »

The President’s back-to-school speech

The Missoulian’s editorial board weighed in today on some local superintendents’ decision to not show President Obama’s Tuesday address to the nation’s schoolchildren.

Do you agree with the editorial that all kids in western Montana should have had the chance to watch Obama’s broadcast? Or do you think local education administrators were right to respond to some parents’ demands that the speech not be required viewing for their children? What do you think?

- Missoula Mom

2 Comments »