LUNAFEST offers films for women – and moms

LUNAFEST, the festival of “short films by, for and about women” kicks off in Missoula tomorrow night at 7 p.m. at the Wilma Theatre. And, of course, its lineup includes several films of particular interest to moms.

“Roz (and Joshua),” for one, is about a woman who dreams of being reunited with her son. In “Omlette,” a mom wrestles with finances in a changing economy. And then there’s “The Kinda Sutra,” which promises to tackle the topic of how babies are made.

That’s only a quick look at the 11 films featured in the festival. There’s also a film directed by Missoula’s own Hasalyn Harris – a news anchor for KECI – and Login Modine. 

Proceeds from the festival, which cost $10 ($5 for students) will go to a good cause – the YWCA’s GUTS! girls leadership program and the Breast Cancer Research Fund.

Call 543-6691 for tickets.

- MM

No Comments »

Advertisement

Women, women everywhere

March is Women’s History Month, March 8 is International Women’s Day and tomorrow, March 6, is the day of Missoula’s third annual Women’s Fair.

The free event is open to all ages and offers a variety of exhibitions, booths, activities and other entertainment “covering every aspect of a woman’s life,” according to the Web site. Oh, and did I mention the bachelor bid?

There’s also a “Baby Sitter Speed Dating” thing happening, which sounds like it works just like other speed dating operations only it’s aimed at matching parents with potential babysitters.

Check out the Web site for more info, or better yet, just show up at the University of Montana Ballroom on the third floor of the University Center between the hours of 11 a.m. to 7 p.m., and see for yourself.

- MM

No Comments »

Mamalode magazine had landed (again)!

Official word was just received that the second issue of Mamalode – the Identity Issue – is being distributed in Missoula today. That, and all the snow, and it’s like Christmas came early for Missoula’s moms!

- MM

No Comments »

Just who is pregnant here?

I received the following essay from a licensed psychologist in Chevy Chase, MD, last week. In it, Lynette Long really goes off on the phrase “We’re pregnant,” apparantly after hearing it one too many times. Read her thoughts – but be forewarned, she describes some of the anatomical apects of pregnancy and the differences between the sexes with an unflinching eye – and then tell me what you think:

“When did it become politically correct to say, we’re pregnant. Gag me with a spoon. We don’t get pregnant. I’ve yet to notice any person with a penis spending his mornings puking his guts out, having a speculum inserted inside his non-existent vagina, or changing his lifestyle to assure the birth of a healthy baby. I also haven’t noticed maternity stores for men where they sell elastic fronted boxer shorts or custom designed wife beater t-shirts for the newest part of the male anatomy: breasts. Nor have I noticed men giving up six packs for a forty-pound egg-shaped belly. So let’s get this straight, we’re not pregnant. Until cloning is a reality, it would be more accurate to say, we’re going to have a baby, since men still contribute 23 of the 46 chromosomes needed to produce a child. Speaking of production, I don’t see men volunteering to endure the excruciating pain of childbirth, the weeks of exhaustion after delivery, or the struggle to get that pre-baby figure back. Let’s not forget about those stretch-marks, that might never disappear or that ’small’ cut a doctor makes to minimize tearing during delivery, which ensures it will burn like ‘heck’ every time you urinate. Anthropologist Margaret Mead once said, ‘If men and women shared pregnancy and childbirth, no family would have over three children, since no man would do it twice.’ She was right.

“When I ask women why they say we’re pregnant rather than I’m pregnant, the responses are based on emotion not logic. ‘It’s sweet.’ ‘I want to include him. I want him to feel a part of it.’ ‘I’m scared and I don’t want to feel like I doing this alone.’ ‘I want him to feel responsible for the baby.’ ‘I want to create buy-in for my partner.’ Whatever happened to individuation and separation? ‘We’re pregnant’ is a denial of reality to create an artificial oneness. Expanding this ‘we-ness’ to other circumstances highlights the absurdity of the claim. The phrase, ‘we got a tooth pulled’ is not used to gain sympathy for a dental visit, nor is ‘we got a promotion’ used to brag about one’s accomplishments at work. Saying ‘we’re pregnant,’ doesn’t change a woman’s personal reality. No matter how you say it, in the end, pregnancy is something women have to do alone.

“The reason the phrase ‘we’re pregnant’ grates on my nerves is that it does what women too often do, share credit and diminish their own personal accomplishments. Pregnancy is a biologically expensive proposition for women. Adult men literally produce 100 million sperm a day and are physically capable of producing hundreds if not thousands of children in a lifetime. Women have a limited number of eggs and make significant biological sacrifices to have children. The phrase, we’re pregnant, diminishes a woman’s experience by implying men and women share equally in the experience. Women deserve full credit for enduring both the burden and responsibility of pregnancy.

“Besides the psychological implications of joint ownership of a pregnancy, there are significant legal implications. When men are pregnant also, who decides when whether or not to terminate a pregnancy? In Japan, where abortion is widely accepted and readily available, women have to get their husband’s permission to have an abortion. Similar legislation could be not far away in the United States and subtle differences in the way we describe experiences may impact the way we legislate them. Ohio Rep. John Adams introduced a bill this year that would require a woman to get the permission of the man she had sex with in order to have an abortion. He argued, men deserve the right to choose, too. So next time you want to say, we’re pregnant, think again. Women have fought long and hard for the right to choose, don’t jeopardize that right for emotional reasons. Protect everyone woman’s right to choose and embrace your pregnancy and the significant contribution you are making to your family.”

- MM

No Comments »

Rate yourself on the mom-xiety meter!

In an e-mail back-and-forth with another mom here in Missoula, we both confessed to being a bit neurotic at times. Especially times when everywhere you turn, there’s new scary information about the swine flu, the regular flu, and boys supposedly drifting away in balloons only to turn up in their parents’ garage only to be investigated as part of what looks like a hoax orchestrated by his family.

Is it any wonder moms get a little over-anxious at times and can’t stop themselves from speed-dialing their pediatricians?

I confess, I rate myself an 8 on the mom-xiety meter, 1 being the parent who just doesn’t care and 10 being the mom who requires therapeutic intervention. An example: While I’m not so anxious as to ban my child from trick-or-treating on Halloween, I know I will throw out about half the candy she brings home just because it gives me a suspicious feeling. It doesn’t have to have a broken seal or any other tell-tale sign of tampering; if it so much as looks at me funny it’s gone.

How about you? What keeps you up at night? Or if you sleep soundly, how do you achieve that zen in such a chaotic, child-endangering world?

- MM

1 Comment »

There should be a study about how moms feel about studies

You know what I just love? Studies comparing “working” mothers and “stay-at-home” moms. I mean, how else could we have guessed what is on the minds of these mysterious creatures? How else could we have known, for instance, that 42 percent of Americans think that women with children should not be working? And that 44 percent of stay-at-home moms think society is worse off because more mothers are working?

Yep, there’s nothing like a new study about working moms to make a working mom feel weird and awful.

The figures I cited come courtesy of just such a study from the Pew Research Center. Right about now, I imagine thousands of working mothers are scanning the title – “The Harried Life of the Working Mother” – and praying that their bosses don’t come across it. What employer wants “harried” employees?

Lucky for me, my bosses just happen to be working mothers. So I’m pretty confident they are among the “solid majority of Americans (75%) (who) reject the idea that women should return to their traditional roles in society,” and who “believe that both husband and wife should contribute to the family income.”

If you noticed an apparent overlap of the people who think moms should stay at home and those who think moms should “contribute to the family income,” you’re not alone. The study notes that many moms themselves are conflicted about it, with quite a few working moms saying their current work hours are not “ideal.”

Nevertheless, the study also shows that an equal percentage of working moms and stay-at-home moms report being “very happy.” Go ahead and count me among these – except when it comes to studies.

And count me with Connie Schultz while you’re at it. In her most recent column, the syndicated columnist (the Missoulian runs her opinion pieces on the Opinion page each Friday) takes issue with the poll’s conclusions, too.

How about you? I hope you’ll take a moment to read the research and report back. I’d love to hear what real moms and dads – not just numbers – think about all this.

- MM

1 Comment »

“Midwives help people out”

That’s from one of my all-time favourite bumper stickers.

You may have noticed a whole lot of midwives – and some of the people they’ve helped out – downtown yesterday afternoon, a whole parade of moms and their kids, pushing strollers and carrying babies and signs.

They were marching to draw attention to the fact that home-birth midwives are not recognized by the federal government, and to deliver a petition to Sen. Max Baucus in the hope that he will help change that.

As part of a national effort called the MAMA Campaign (Mothers and Midwives in Action), the participants hoped to persuade Baucus to include health care coverage for families who want their pregnancies and births overseen by certified midwives. They point out that allowing families to choose between a hospital and home birth is a cost-saving opportunity, because the average cost of a home birth is roughly half what it is for a hospital birth.

- MM

No Comments »

Mamalode founder says it all in five minutes

A new community event recently arrived in Missoula. It’s called Ignite Missoula, and it’s designed around a theme that gives a number of locals five minutes and 20 PowerPoint slides to talk about anything they want.

The first one (of many to come) was held on Sept. 2 and featured Mamalode founder Elke Govertsen giving a presentation called “You say mom-jeans like it’s a bad thing: Moms defy recession; how to harness the power.”

I particularly enjoyed her rapid-fire description of a mom’s occupational duties. Enjoy!

- Missoula Mom

1 Comment »

Mom stuff in the news

I’m playing catch-up again, hoping to get ’round to posting about all the interesting news articles I’ve been reading lately. Since it doesn’t look like that’s going to happen, I’ll just post a few of the more interesting, recent articles.

First, the good news: More Missoula schools met No Child Left Behind Act standards last go-around.

Then, the bad news: This will come as no surprise to anyone who has looked for child care in this state, but “Montana’s child care system has serious flaws.” This story, I believe, is the result of state bureau reporter Jennifer McKee’s recent search for day-care stories.

And don’t miss this story about Mountain Home in Missoula. It’s a lovely, heartbreaking, hopeful glimpse into the lives of some young local mothers struggling to build a better life for their children and themselves. If you’re moved enough to want to take action, note that Mountain Home is currently looking for volunteers to serve as board members.

- Missoula Mom

No Comments »

Breastfeeding news and legal trends

Breastfeeding is one of those topics that never fails to attract controversy, and for the life of me, I can’t figure out why. Babies need their mothers to feed them, and babies don’t have any grasp of social concepts like modesty or delayed gratification. While moms most certainly do have that understanding, I still would expect any mother to put her baby’s need to be fed ahead of … well, ahead of just about anything else.

So when hunger calls, moms must deliver. Unfortunately, most moms also understand that the wider world – and more than a few judges – don’t always see it so.

For one critical look at a recent court case on breastfeeding and workplace discrimination against pregnant women, check out Cleveland Plain Dealer Connie Schultz’s latest syndicated column.

Fortunately, Montana has pretty strong laws protecting a woman’s right to pump breastmilk and breastfeed at the workplace and in public: Montana Code Ann. § 50-19-501 (2002) “provides that the breastfeeding of a child in any location, public or private, cannot be considered a nuisance, indecent exposure, sexual conduct, or obscenity.”

And efforts to strengthen those laws continue. Two years ago, for instance, Missoula’s Carol Williams, a state senator, introduced a law to the Montana Legislature that would require public employers to provide a private room to lactating mothers for the purpose of pumping or breastfeeding.

And following the most recent legislative session, Gov. Brian Schweitzer signed a law saying that lactating women may be excused from jury duty.

However, not everyone in Montana is up to speed on these laws. In an earlier post, I mentioned the Missoula Breastfeeding Coalition, which aims to educate Missoulians on the rights and responsibilities of breastfeeding. There’s also a statewide coalition that acts as a handy clearinghouse of information and additional resources.

- Missoula Mom

1 Comment »